Competition or Complementarity Between ChatGPT and University Libraries: Perceptions of Higher Education Students about the support in academic tasks
Abstract
In this study, we analyze the use of ChatGPT in activities that take place in the academic community. This research investigates how this Chabot has been used by university students in Portugal and Brazil, and what impact this tool has had on their university libraries. The instrument used was a survey of students from different universities. The objectives of this survey were to obtain: data on the perception of the use of ChatGPT, its usefulness in fulfilling academic tasks, and how it affects the frequency or use of university libraries.
References
Adetayo, A. J. (2023). Artificial intelligence chatbots in academic libraries: the rise of ChatGPT. In Library Hi Tech News (Vol. 40, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0007
Alonso Arévalo, J., & Quinde, M. (2023). MARLE ChatGPT. Revista Desiderata, 22, 136–142.
Association of Research Libraries. (2024). Research Libraries Guiding Principles for Artificial Intelligence Background. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29242/principles.ai2024.
Association of Research Libraries, Coalition for Networked Information, & Stratus Inc. (2024). ARL/CNI AI Scenarios: AI-Influenced Futures. https://doi.org/10.29242/report.aiscenarios2024
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
European Comission. (2024). Living guidelines on the Responsible use of generative AI in research. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj
Frederick, D. E. (2023). ChatGPT: a viral data-driven disruption in the information environment. In Library Hi Tech News (Vol. 40, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-04-2023-0063
IFLA Special Interest Group Artificial Intelligence. (2023). Developing a library strategic response to artificial intelligence.
Jisc. (2023). AI in tertiary education: A summary of the current state of play – Third edition.
Oyelude, A. A. (2023). Much ado about ChatGPT: libraries and librarians perspectives. In Library Hi Tech News (Vol. 40, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2023-0050
Pelletier, K., McCormack, M., Muscanell, N., Reeves, J., Robert, J., & Arbino, N. (2024). 2024 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and Learning Edition. https://www.educause.edu/horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-2024
Robert, J., & Muscanell, N. (2023). 2023 EDUCAUSE Horizon Action Plan: Generative AI. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2023/5/
Shnurenko, I., Murovana, T., & Kushchu, I. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: Media and Information Literacy, Human Rights and Freedom of Expression (I. Kushchu & T. Demirel, Eds.). http://en.unesco.org/open-access/
UNESCO. (2023). ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in higher education Quick start guide. http://en.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en
Vargas-Murillo, A. R., de la Asuncion Pari-Bedoya, I. N. M., & de Jesús Guevara-Soto, F. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities of AI-Assisted Learning: A Systematic Literature Review on the Impact of ChatGPT Usage in Higher Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(7). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.7.7
Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.