Beyond the Library Learning Spaces: An Assessment of Discussion Room Usage of the De La Salle University Libraries
Keywords:
Learning Space, Space Utilization, Space Assessment, Discussion Room, Philippine Academic LibrariesAbstract
Academic libraries have embraced evaluation as a way to acquire information that is used to guide administrators’ and service providers’ decision-making in recent decades. In an era where libraries aim to assist users at the moment of need, thoughtfully designed and well-carried-out evaluations can shed light on a variety of library operations, including service performance, space use, and overall user satisfaction (Trembach S. et al., 2020). Students perform better when they participate in learning commons (Khan, 2020), and they study best when given the opportunity to do so in a friendly and encouraging setting (Holeton, 2020). This paper is to understand how the De La Salle University Libraries can better support the academic community by improving the space utilization and accessibility of their discussion room. And aims to examine the actual use of discussion rooms in the De La Salle University Libraries from 2017-2022, which includes understanding how the discussion rooms were used before and during the pandemic; assess the adequacy of the discussion rooms as learning spaces, that involves determining if the available discussion rooms meet the needs of library patrons for collaboration and study; identify the major users of discussion rooms, signifying which colleges/schools use the discussion rooms the most; and determine the preferred booking times for discussion rooms, which indicates understanding when users typically book the discussion rooms. This study employs a descriptive research methodology. Data were extracted and culled from Springshare (a content management system used by DLSU Libraries for online room booking), and used tables and percentages to describe the usage of discussion rooms. The data were then analyzed using the measure of central tendency, mean. Frequency and percentage were also employed to present the data and show its distribution. A tabulated summary and graph were made to interpret the results easily. The research findings highlight the usage trends of discussion rooms at De La Salle University from 2017 to 2022. Overall, there was a peak in usage during the academic year 2018-2019 (102,284 users), followed by a significant drop in 2020 due to the pandemic. Undergraduate students consistently represented the highest user group, totaling 122,579 across the years. The Ramon V. Del Rosario College of Business (RVRCOB) led in user numbers among colleges, while the highest room usage was recorded for 8B. Daily usage peaked on Thursdays, with the booking hours changing post-pandemic to reflect safety protocols. The findings ultimately illustrate the impact of COVID-19 on discussion room accessibility and user behavior. The results of this physical learning space initiative will provide the librarians with an actual number of usage of discussion rooms per floor and will equip innovative ideas for future redesigning or redevelopment for improvement, if necessary, of the said learning space for active teaching and learning.
References
Adeyemi, B. M. (2017). Assessment of study space usage in the Kenneth Dike Library.
Applegate, R. (2009). The library is for studying: Student preferences for study space. The Journal of academic librarianship, 35(4), 341-346.
Bryant, J., Matthews, G., & Walton, G. (2009). Academic libraries and social and learning space: A case study of Loughborough University Library, UK. Journal of librarianship and information science, 41(1), 7-18.
Cha, S.H. and Kim, T.W. (2015), “What matters for students’ use of physical library space?” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 274-279.
Choy, F. C., & Goh, S. N. (2016). A framework for planning academic library spaces. Library Management, 37(1), 13-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-01-2016-0001
Crawford, W. (1999). Library space. Online 23(2): 61.
Cunningham, H. V. and Tabur, S. (2012). Learning space attribute: reflection on academic library design and its use. Journal of Learning Space, 1(2)
Delaney, G. and Bates, J. (2015), “Envisioning the academic library: a reflection on roles, relevancy, and relationships,” New Review of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 30-51.
De La Salle University Libraries Guidelines on the Use of Discussion Rooms. (2013). [Review of Guidelines on the Use of Discussion Rooms]. DLSU Libraries.
Foster, N. F. (2010). "Why do students want to be in the library if they are not using the books?" Presented at the University of Toronto iSchool Colloquium Series.
Foster, N. F., & Gibbons, S. L. (Eds.) (2007). Studying students: The undergraduate research project at the University of Rochester. Chicago, Association of College & Research Libraries.
Fuller-Gregory. (2020). Reimagining the Library as Third Place. Public Libraries, 59(4), 9–11.
Hamilton-Nixon. (2019). Academic Libraries as Third Place: Spatial Transformation of the Library Learning Environments at the University of Johannesburg. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Holeton, R. (2020). Toward Inclusive Learning Spaces: Physiological, Cognitive, and Cultural Inclusion and the Learning Space Rating System. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/2/toward-inclusive-learning-spaces
Houghton, Foth, M., & Miller, E. (2013). The continuing relevance of the library as a third place for users and non-users of IT: the case of Canada Bay. The Australian Library Journal, 62(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2013.771764
Khan, S. (2020). Impact of learning spaces on student success. Retrieved from https://www.edtechreview.in/trends-insights/insights/impact-of-learning-spaces-on-student-success/
Nitecki, D. A. (2011). Space Assessment as a Venue for Defining the Academic Library. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 81(1), 27–59. https://doi.org/10.1086/657446
Oliveira, S.M. (2018), “Trends in academic library space: from book boxes to learning commons,” Open Information Science, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 59-74.
Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges, and Universities (PAASCU). (2010). PAASCU Survey Form A: Common Areas [Review of PAASCU Survey Form A: Common Areas]. PAASCU.
Philippine Association of Academic/Research Librarians, Inc. (2022). 2022 PAARL Standards for Academic Libraries [Review of 2022 PAARL Standards for Academic Libraries]. PAARL.
Shill, H. B. and Tonner, S. (2003). Creating a Better Place: Physical Improvements in Academic Libraries 1995–2002. College and Research Libraries 64(6): 431–466.
"Standards for Libraries in Higher Education," American Library Association, August 29, 2006. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/standardslibraries (Accessed May 25, 2023) Document ID: e169adbd-8407-4434-31c5-c14771a447b2Stanley. (2005). The third place’: The role of the library in today’s society. Incite (Sydney), 26(4), 14–. https://doi.org/10.2547/0158-0876.26.4.0580
Suarez, Doug.(2007). “What students do when they study in the library: Using ethnographic methods to observe student behavior,” Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship 8(3).
Trembach, S., Blodgett, J., Epperson, A. and Floersch, N. (2020), "The whys and hows of academic library space assessment: a case study," Library Management, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-04-2019-002
United Nations. (n.d.-a). Contribution of libraries to the SDGs | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/contribution-libraries-sdgs#description
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.